By Exemplary AI
Reviewed
Does every reviewer need to start from a blank page?
Manual review puts all the reading, searching and note-taking on a person. AI-assisted review prepares relevant details and source references for that person to check. It is useful when the same checks repeat across many documents. People still handle judgment, unusual cases and final approval.
We help prepare the information. Your experts make the call.
Exemplary can find relevant details across the documents you provide and show where they came from. We help turn your review checklist into an AI-assisted process, giving reviewers a starting point they can verify.
Talk to us about your task- You share the questions your reviewers ask repeatedly.
- We help set up document reading and source-linked answers.
- Your reviewers confirm the findings and decide what to do next.
What changes for your team?
Scroll across the table to view both approaches.
| What matters | Read and collect details by hand | Let AI prepare the review |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | Open the documents and search for the details. | Start with prepared details and links to the source. |
| Repeated checks | A person repeats each check for every file. | AI helps prepare the same checks across files. |
| Unusual cases | A reviewer interprets them directly. | A reviewer checks unclear or unexpected findings. |
| Final decision | A person decides. | A person still decides where judgment or approval is required. |
When each approach fits.
Read and collect details by hand
- You handle only a few documents.
- Each case requires substantial expert judgment.
Let AI prepare the review
- Your team repeats the same searches across many files.
- Reviewers need a clear summary with sources they can check.
Prepare a contract renewal review without starting from scratch.
An example of AI helping with preparation while the reviewer retains the decision.
- 01
Name the questions
Ask for the renewal date, notice period and any relevant changes.
- 02
Gather the details
Exemplary helps find the relevant passages and prepares a source-linked answer.
- 03
Review the source
The reviewer checks those passages and decides how to proceed.
Measure the time spent checking, too.
A quick summary only helps if it is easy to verify. Include corrections and checking time when comparing the old process with the new one.
Make missing information visible.
A missing date or conflicting clause should lead to a follow-up, not a confident guess. Include incomplete documents in the trial and agree how the team should handle them.
Questions you might have.
Does this replace our reviewers?
The aim here is to reduce repetitive preparation. Your reviewers still check the information and make decisions that require their expertise.
Can we check where an answer came from?
Exemplary provides references back to source documents so a reviewer can inspect the supporting information.
Where should we start?
Choose a document type your team sees often and a short list of questions it already checks. We help set up a trial around those examples.
More about these options
These guides explain how to choose an approach. Examples show how a task could work; they are not customer results. The links below explain the capabilities and background behind this guide.